Legal Opinion

Seattle Trust Co. v. Pitner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1897No. 2575PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court. King County. — Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

Appellant instituted an action in the su*366perior court of King county against the respondent Pitner to recover the sum of'$3,533.25, and sued out a writ of garnishment therein directed to the "Washington National Bank as garnishee, requiring it to answer in what amount it was indebted to Pitner, and what effects, if any, of the said Pitner it had in its possession or under its control. The bank, by its cashier, appeared and filed its answer to the writ, admitting an indebtedness to Pitner in the sum of $407.43, the same being an ordinary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Thompson v. EllsworthNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
  3. Kelly v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cook v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1877
  5. Erickson v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walter Box Co. v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mogelberg v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bruhn v. SteffinsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Morris & Co. v. Canadian Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API