Legal Opinion

Kayser v. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1898Published

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J.. Garnishment proceedings by Charles F. Kayser against the Farmers & Mechanics’ Bank, as garnishee of Gustave Brehm. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment on October 24, 1896, against one Brehm before a justice of the peace; proceedings against the defendant bank, as garnishee, being then pending, disclosure being made on November 7th. On November 24th a summons to show cause was issued against the garnishee, which was followed by judgment. Appeal was taken to the circuit court, where an objection to evidence upon the ground that the justice had no jurisdiction to issue the summons to show cause, inasmuch as more than 30 days had elapsed after judgment against Brehm, was sustained. The cause is here upon writ…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Heritage v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API