Legal Opinion

Dean v. Tucker

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1994No. Docket 147875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff appeals as of right from the circuit court’s orders refusing to find plaintiff’s witness qualified as an expert and holding that the damages resulting from defendants’ failure to respond timely to a mediation evaluation were to be determined by the court, not the jury. We affirm.

The lawsuit underlying the malpractice action arose from injuries sustained by plaintiff after she stepped into an open manhole in the parking lot of a drug store. Defendant Frank Mafrice represented plaintiff in her lawsuit against the property owner. During the course of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Turtur & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Joerger v. Gordon Food Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Bass v. CombsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. MarkelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Put v. Fki Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API