Walbridge-Aldinger Co. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The appeal here is from an order of the district court of Mayes county overruling and denying the motion of plaintiffs in error to vacate an-order of injunction or restraining order theretofore granted by said court in favor of defendant in error and against plaintiffs in error.
The c-ity of Tulsa was engaged in constructing a water-works system, whereby it was intended that water should be brought from Spavinaw creek in Mayes county to supply the city and its inhabitants. Wal-bridge-Aldinger Company had contracted with the said city to construct the conduit line for the water. After a large…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Dowdy v. ClausewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Callaway v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Jennings v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.