Legal Opinion
Dowdy v. Clausewitz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 18, 1961No. 37837PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Justice.
Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs in their first amended petition alleged that an oral partnership agreement was entered into between the parties in the State of Texas in March or April, 1949, to engage in the cattle business. Plaintiff put up the money to start and carry on the business. The defendant, Monroe Dowdy, was to actually look after the cattle. There were good years and bad in this operation.
In April 1954, Milton Clausewitz and Monroe Dowdy entered into a new agreement, which was verbal, in the State of Texas (a community…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Althof v. ConheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Walbridge-Aldinger Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Whitney v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Jennings v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sta-Rite Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Homer JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- McCullough v. Leede Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Crest Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.