Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 11, 1909No. 282PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by Charity Cameron against the International Harvester Company of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defend1 .ant brings error. Citing: Dame v. Cochiti, etc., Co. (N. M.) 79 Pac. 290.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The question essential for determination is as to whether or not the petition will sustain the judgment rendered by default. In the case of Leforce v. Haymes, ante, p. 190, 105 Pac. 644, this court said: I

“Where a declaration, petition, or complaint is so defective that a general demurrer thereto before or motion in arrest after judgment should be sustained, and judgment is rendered thereon by default, on review in an appellate court, the question of the insufficiency of such pleading to sustain the judgment may be raised.”

In that case numerous Kansas cases are cited to the effect that, where…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Leforce v. HaymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Baker v. HammettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Goodwin v. BickfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API