Legal Opinion

Barnebey-Cheney Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 21, 1973No. 5510, C.A.D. 1110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Tbis appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, 68 Cust. Ct. 98, C.D. 4343 (1972), overruling appellant’s protest against the classification under paragraph 69 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, of imported merchandise consisting of spent activated carbon salvaged in Great Britain from canisters of gas masks. We reverse.

The referenced paragraph provides as follows:

Decolorizing, deodorizing, or gas-absorbing chars and carbons, whether or not activated, and all activated chars and carbons_ 19% ad val.

Appellant claims that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Select Tire Salvage Co., Inc. v. The United States. The Connecticut Tire Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. The United States v. David StudnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Supreme Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. Interocean Chemical & Minerals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. American Rusch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API