E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case was entered at the port of Alexandria Bay, N.Y. on various dates in 1970 and 1971. It is described on the invoices as dull or semi-dull “nylon 66, advanced waste in tow form”. It was assessed with duty under item 309.30, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by Presidential Proclamation 3822, T.D. 68-9, as grouped filaments of man-made fibers, in continuous form, valued not over 80 cents per pound, at 11.9 cents or 10 cents per pound, depending upon the date of entry. It is claimed to be dutiable at 10 per centum or 9 per centum ad…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975