Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1990No. 88-5986PublishedCited by 716 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In order to combat child pornography, Ohio enacted Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.323(A)(3) (Supp. 1989), which provides in pertinent part:

“(A) No person shall do any of the following:
“(3) Possess or view any material or performance that shows a minor who is not the person’s child or ward in a state of nudity, unless one of the following applies:
“(a) The material or performance is sold, disseminated, displayed, possessed, controlled, brought or caused to be brought into this state, or presented for a bona fide artistic, medical, scientific, educational, religious, governmental, judicial, or other…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by716 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

711 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API