Legal Opinion

Jerry Franklin v. Josh Hawley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2018No. 16-4378PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Jerry Franklin sought habeas relief on the basis that his attorney in the underlying state-court proceeding failed to fulfill Franklin’s explicit instruction to appeal his conviction and sentence. The district court granted the petition, finding that Franklin’s procedural default of that claim was excused under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). We disagree because Martinez expressly does not excuse a procedural default that occurs in the appeal of a collateral state court proceeding. We therefore reverse.

I. Background

In 2009,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jim Harris, Jr. v. Ian WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Leonard Taylor v. Troy SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Elliott Finch, Jr. v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Darrell Bolden v. David VandergriffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. Assad v. WasmerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API