Jerry Franklin v. Josh Hawley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Jerry Franklin sought habeas relief on the basis that his attorney in the underlying state-court proceeding failed to fulfill Franklin’s explicit instruction to appeal his conviction and sentence. The district court granted the petition, finding that Franklin’s procedural default of that claim was excused under Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). We disagree because Martinez expressly does not excuse a procedural default that occurs in the appeal of a collateral state court proceeding. We therefore reverse.
I. Background
In 2009,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jim Harris, Jr. v. Ian WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Leonard Taylor v. Troy SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Elliott Finch, Jr. v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Darrell Bolden v. David VandergriffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Assad v. WasmerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.