Legal Opinion

Kapelus v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. L.A. 32207PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.*

This is a proceeding to review the unanimous recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner Marvin B. Kapelus be disbarred. The recommendation is based on findings in two separate matters, one involving petitioner’s alleged misconduct in the representation of a client in an employment dispute (the Hammer matter), and the other involving alleged conflicts of interest arising from petitioner’s personal participation, and representation of multiple parties, in a tax reduction plan (the LAPSC matter). After a consolidated hearing, the State Bar…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. William H. Raley Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hawk v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. v. Silldorf, BurdmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. In Re BasingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API