Legal Opinion
Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. v. Silldorf, Burdman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1989No. D008664PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd., and certain of its partners (hereafter referred to as Tri-Growth or plaintiffs) appeal a summary judgment in favor of the law firm of Silldorf, Burdman, Duignan & Eisenberg et al. (hereafter referred to as the law firm or defendants). Tri-Growth sued to impose a constructive trust and for damages alleging breach of fiduciary duty and interference with prospective economic advantage after the law firm purchased certain real property (1810 State Street) for which TriGrowth was negotiating. We hold there are triable issues of material fact requiring…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.