Legal Opinion
United States v. David Howard Craig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1999No. 98-10162PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal by David Howard Craig of the restitution order imposed for his violation of the Child Support and Recovery Act (the “Act” or “CSRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 228, requires us to decide whether restitution under the Act must be limited to the time period during which the defendant lives in a state different than that of his children and whether district courts should inquire into a defendant’s ability to pay prior to ordering a restitution award. We also must determine whether the particular restitution order entered against Craig violated the Commerce Clause or the Due…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Samuel D. SageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lynn Truman CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Keith Douglas BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BigfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. EdelkindCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Michael Andrew GillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Orvial StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.