Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Andrew Gill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 2001No. 00-10304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Michael Gill (“Gill”) appeals the restitution imposed for his willful failure to pay child support under the Child Support Recovery Act (“CSRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 228(a). We must decide whether the restitution order properly included accrued interest as part of his unpaid child support obligation when the underlying state court order made no express mention of interest, but the applicable state law clearly mandated the accrual of interest on any delinquent payments as set forth in the order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Allan A. Mussari, United States of America v. Donald W. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Gerald Black, United States of America v. Stephen R. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. CollinsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  4. United States v. David Howard CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Secretary of State for the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. MolakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Orvial StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re BlackstoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  5. Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Secretary of State for the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API