Legal Opinion
United States v. Bigford
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 13, 2004No. 01-7132PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant was charged with violating the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act (“DPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 228, for willfully failing to pay a support obligation with respect to a child residing in another state. Defendant filed in the district court a motion to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the Oklahoma default judgment ordering him to pay child support was rendered without personal jurisdiction. The district court concluded that the DPPA does not permit a defendant to raise the invalidity of the child support order as a defense and therefore denied Defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Weininger v. CastroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Kennedy ex rel. Kennedy v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- United States v. Clifford KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In re Dar. C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.