Pietrus v. J. R. Watkins Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action for damages sustained by reason of plaintiff’s complete loss of her hair alleged to have resulted from her use of a bottle of Watkins Coconut Oil Shampoo sold her by defendant J. R. Watkins Company, a corporation, in May 1945, through its agent, defendant L. J. Coates. The jury returned a verdict of $20,000 in plaintiff’s favor against the Watkins company, which has appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. The company will hereinafter be referred to as defendant.
Plaintiff, 32 years of age at the time of the trial, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Karr v. Inecto, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Tremaine, Exrx. v. H. K. Mulford Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Tiedje v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Bark v. DixsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Twombley v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Schilling v. Roux Distributing Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Carter Carburetor Corp. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Chatfield v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.