Legal Opinion
Tiedje v. Haney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1931No. 28,501PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The plaintiff had a verdict against the Haney Drug Company in a suit to recover damages due to the taking of tablets which were purchased from the defendant and which are alleged to have contained poison which injuriously affected the plaintiff’s health. Upon the trial the case was dismissed as to Marie Haney, and the jury found no verdict against W. C. Haney. D. C. Leo & Company were not served and did not appear in the action. The trial court granted the Haney Drug Company’s motion for a new trial on the ground of error of law occurring in the trial. The particular error specified was the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ferguson v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- West v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- State v. KendigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. City Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Foster v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Mulroy v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- McMillen v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.