Legal Opinion

Chatfield v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1978No. 47785PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action to recover damages allegedly resulting from breaches of warranty in the sale of red barn paint, the jury found by a special verdict that defendant paint manufacturer breached an express warranty that the paint was “good barn paint” and the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. 1 It also found that the breaches were a direct cause of plaintiff’s damages; that plaintiff was negligent and his negligence was a direct cause of his consequential damages; that 85 percent of the fault causing such consequential damages was attributable to defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. A. L. Brown v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Chisholm v. JR SIMPLOT COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Dr. Luel P. Overstreet v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. International Financial Services, Inc. v. FranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Loren Zutz Deb Zutz Ron Zutz, Doing Business as Zutz Farms, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Case Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Mattson v. Rochester Silo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API