Legal Opinion
Vieths v. Ripley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 15, 1980No. 48671, 48672, 49180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Third-party defendant ADM Milling Company (ADM) appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding defendants and third-party plaintiffs Harry Munson, d.b.a. Munson Crane and Rental Service, and Wayne Ripley, Munson’s employee, 100% contribution of damages paid in the main action and from an order denying its motions for post-trial relief. Third-party defendant Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (Archer-Daniels) also appeals from that judgment which denied its counterclaim for workers compensation payments made to the plaintiff. The principal issues on appeal are whether…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Aversa v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.