Legal Opinion
Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1984No. C5-83-1269, C4-83-1733PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
The opinion of August 14,1984, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendant DICO Company, Inc. (DICO) on a products liability claim. DICO asserts the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of third-party defendant New London Concrete and Supply Company (New London), in granting summary judgment to defendant Cutler-Hammer, Inc. (Cutler-Hammer), in ruling on various evidentiary matters, on the sufficiency of the evidence against DICO, in the constitutionality of submitting the question of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kallio v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Simeone v. First Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Willmar Poultry Co. v. Carus Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Royce Young v. Pollock Engineering Group, Inc. Pollock Research and Design, Inc. Computech, a Sole Proprietorship and Lewis L. Deland, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.