Legal Opinion

Buhler v. Maddison

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1943No. 6517PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDONOUGH, Justice.

This action was brought by plaintiff Buhler to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him in the course of his employment while working on the Lone Pine lode mining claims near Elko, Nevada. Defendant W. E. Maddi-son and one Howard E. Grant were joint owners of these mining claims. In the complaint plaintiff alleges that Grant was the agent for Maddison, and that defendant failed to cover his employees with workmen’s compensation insurance, and that the injuries resulted from the negligence of defendant in furnishing defective fuse.

This case has been tried twice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palle v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Weber County-Ogden City Relief Committee v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Fay v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Porter v. Tempa Mining & Milling Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fidelity Metals Corp. v. RisleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. RiversIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API