Legal Opinion

Fay v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1941No. 6259PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission denying plaintiff benefits on account of the death of her husband, Richard W. Fay, a salesman for B. F. Goodrich Company. He was killed on March 30,1939, in an automobile accident in the State of Idaho, while traveling in the course of his employment.

The facts are not disputed. Fay entered the employ of the B. F. Goodrich Company at his home office in Akron, Ohio, on November 6, 1933, and was continuously in its employ until his death. At first he was engaged in sales promotion work in the Midwest. In 1935 he was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Lester v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lawhead v. United Air LinesHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API