Rankin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted by jury of possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, weighing less than 28 grams. Appellant pled true to two enhancement counts, and the jury assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction in an opinion on motion for rehearing. Rankin v. State, 881 S.W.2d 14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st] 1994). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review in order to address whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that appellant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- McDonald v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
- Shugart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Zarco v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Villanueva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- Shea v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.