Gomez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GONZALEZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction by a jury for murder. Punishment was assessed by the court at ten years.
The sole ground of error is the admission of an extraneous offense. We affirm.
Without objection appellant was tried jointly with Roel Rodriguez under separate indictments. Appellant and Rodriguez were represented by the same retained counsel.
As part of the defense case, Rodriguez testified that appellant fired the fatal shots in response to the deceased’s advancing on appellant with a knife. Appellant did not testify. Based on Rodriguez’ testimony appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Rubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Halliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- McDonald v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.