Paradigm DKD Grp., LLC v. Pima Cnty. Assessor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:
¶1 Appellants Pima County Assessor and Bill Staples, Pima County Assessor (collectively, "the Assessor") assert the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs to the appellees, Paradigm DKD Group, LLC, Eastpoint 22nd Market Place, LLC, and Thomas Francis Naifeh (collectively, "Paradigm") upon finding Paradigm substantially prevailed in its special action seeking public records pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 42-11009(A)(2) and 39-121.02. For the following reasons, we vacate the judgment below and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Factual and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Michael Alan Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Eddie David Cox v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarron Smith v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- Abraham v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 2026
- Matthew Abraham ph.D. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Matthew Abraham ph.D. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025