Legal Opinion

In Re Super Prem. Ice Cream Distrib. Antitrust Lit.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 23, 1988No. MDL No. 682, No. C-85-6553-CALPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

691 F.Supp. 1262 (1988)

In re SUPER PREMIUM ICE CREAM DISTRIBUTION ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

This document relates to: ALL CASES.

The HAAGEN-DAZS COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

DOUBLE RAINBOW GOURMET ICE CREAMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

MDL No. 682, No. C-85-6553-CAL.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 23, 1988.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, William C. Miller, Reginald D. Steer, Brian D. Bellardo, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Patricia E. Henle, Alioto & Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., John H. Boone, Law Office of John H. Boone, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION AND…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Martin Ice Cream Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  4. United States v. Oracle Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. Datel Holdings Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API