Legal Opinion
United States v. Oracle Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 9, 2004No. C 04-0807 VRWPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER THEREON
WALKER, Chief Judge.
The government, acting through the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and the states of Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Ohio and Texas, First Amended Complaint (FAC) (Doc. # 125) ¶ 3 at 5-6, seek to enjoin Oracle Corporation from acquiring, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock of PeopleSoft, Inc. Plaintiffs allege that the acquisition would violate section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 USC § 18. Both companies are publicly traded and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa Inc. v. St. Luke's Health System, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.