Legal Opinion
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 29, 2008No. M 02-1486 PJHPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss portions of plaintiffs’ second amended complaint came on for hearing on December 12, 2007 before this court. Plaintiffs, the indirect purchaser class (“plaintiffs”), appeared through their counsel, Josef Cooper, Daniel J. Mogin, David Boies, Francis 0. Scar-pulla, and Daniel E. Gustafson. Defendants 1 appeared through their counsel, Joshua Hess, Aton Arbisser, David Brown-stein, Howard M. Ullman, Robert Pringle, Tim M. Martin, and Kenneth R. O’Rourke.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.