Legal Opinion

Application of Charles E. Inman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 8, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 9, 10, 15, and 16 of appellant’s application No. 136,388 for a patent on a chlorinated hydrocarbon product on the grounds (1) as lacking invention over the cited prior art, and (2) failure to differentiate patentably from the claims of appellant’s co-pending application No. 136,389, which is now before this court in companion appeal No. 6162, 228 F.2d 229.

Appellant requested reconsideration of the board’s pertinent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. In Re GauerkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. In re LeumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In re ChristensenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Everlube Corp. of America v. Electrofilm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API