Legal Opinion

In re Leum

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1946No. 5210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJaoicson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner *763rejecting all of the claims 7, 8, 9 and 12 of an application for a patent, alleging new and useful improvements in a method of producing toluene from alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons by catalytic treatment in the presence of benzene for lack of invention over the patent to Sachanen et al., 2,257,920, October 7,1941.

Claim 7, which is the broadest of the appealed claims, is representative of the subject matter and reads as follows:

7. The method of producing toluene…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Habet M. KhelghatianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re LieserCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In re KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. In re InmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API