Legal Opinion

In re Christensen

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 6, 1936No. 3437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office rejected all appellant’s claims in an application for a patent relating to the treatment of cream and other dairy products. The Board of Appeals affirmed the action of the examiner, and from the decision of the board appellant has here appealed.

The rejected claims are numbered 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11 to 15 inclusive, 18 to 23 inclusive, and 26. Claims 2, 4, 6, 9, 11 to 13 inclusive, *101619 to 23 inclusive, and 26 are drawn to cover the main .feature of the alleged invention — the use in cream treatment of an organic material having available…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re InmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Application of Charles E. InmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API