Legal Opinion
Shirey v. Tri-State Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 7, 1954No. 35882PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
Essie Shirey, as plaintiff, seeks in this action to recover on an automobile insurance policy, insuring against the peril of windstorm, damage to her automobile alleged to have been sustained as a result of a windstorm. The policy excludes from coverage damage sustained to the automobile caused by collision or upset.
Defendant answered by general and special denial. It specifically denied that the damage to plaintiff’s automobile, if any, was caused by windstorm, but alleged that it was caused by collision and upset.
At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence on motion of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gerhard v. Travelers Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Clouse v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Marks v. Lumbermen's Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duensing v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Kelly v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- National American Insurance Co. v. Gerlicher Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Friedman v. Insurance Company of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.