Gerhard v. Travelers Fire Insurance

The question in this case is whether damage to plaintiff’s summer cottage located on the east shore of Green Bay by ice blown across the bay and against the cottage is within the coverage of a policy issued by defendant to plaintiff.' The question arises upon what is denominated an extended coverage indorsement insuring, in addition to fire risk assumed by' the principal part of the policy, perils of “windstorm, cyclone, tornado and hail,” except as hereinafter provided. The proviso which is of importance here is as follows:

“This company shall not be liable for any loss or damage . . .…