Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Insurance Company of North America
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The appellant does not deny the existence of a windstorm but does question the cause of the damage to the tractor-trailer. There are two basic questions involved : (1) The interpretation of the insuring clauses of the policy, and (2) whether there is any credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the damage to the tractor arid trailer was caused by the windstorm. The insuring clauses of the policy provide:
“Coverage A — Comprehensive Loss of or Damage to the Automobile Except by Collision or Upset: To pay for any direct and accidental loss of or damage to the automobile, hereinafter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gerhard v. Travelers Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Newark Trust Co. v. Agricultural Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- National Fire Insurance v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Evana Plantation, Inc. v. Yorkshire Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hughes v. Great American Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kreyer v. Farmers' Co-operative Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Schwartz v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976