Legal Opinion
United States v. Perkins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1933No. 723PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
After a trial without a jury, the lower court found that appellee was totally and permanently disabled on and after July 1, 1919, and rendered judgment in his favor on a policy of war risk insurance. This appeal presents the single question of whether there is any substantial evidence on which the judgment may rest.
The appellee had pneumonia while in a camp in this country, and was slightly gassed during the St. Mihiel and ArgOnne offensives. From his discharge in July, 1919, until July, 1922, he did some farm work. From July, 1922, until March, 1931, he was employed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HarthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Skelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Parrigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.