Legal Opinion
Farley v. Heininger
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 17, 1939No. 7240PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Appellee filed a bill in the lower court praying that a "fraud order issued against him by the Postmaster General on February 19, 1938, pursuant to Sections 3929 and 4041, R.S., 1 be declared null and void and its enforcement enjoined. The lower court found that “There was no substantial evidence that plaintiff herein [appellee] was engaged in a scheme or device to defraud, and therefore the decision of the Postmaster General was wrong and arbitrary.” Accordingly it granted an injunction. This- appeal is from that order.
Since 1926 appellee has been engaged in selling…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- In re L.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Yankee Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Dynaquest Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.