Legal Opinion

United States v. Hammons

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1933No. 811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is a war risk insurance case. It was tried to the court below without the intervention of a jury, by stipulation, and at the close of all the evidence each party submitted a motion for judgment in his favor. The motion of the appellee, plaintiff in the court below, was sustained, and a judgment entered in his favor accordingly, to which an exception on the part of the appellant, defendant in the court below, was taken and allowed. The appeal brings before this court the question of the soundness of such judgment.

It was stipulated that the plaintiff was inducted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Roberts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  2. Nichols v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. Dawson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API