Legal Opinion
United States v. Harth
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1932No. 9421PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBÜRGH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment against the United States upon a policy of war risk insurance. Substantially the only error assigned and argued is the action of the trial court in refusing to grant appellant’s motion for a directed verdict upon the ground that plaintiff-appellee had failed to prove the existence of a permanent and total disability during the life of the contract sued upon. Error was also assigned to the court’s charge relative to total and permanent disability, but the substance of this point is embraced within the scope of the preceding…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Solomon Dehydrating Company, Incorporated v. Clarence R. Guyton, Central Greyhound Lines, Incorporated, and the Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Ed S. Michelson, Inc. v. Nebraska Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. De ParcqCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.