Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 2010No. Docket No. 288040PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fer CURIAM.

This case arises out of the alleged right of certain landlocked property owners to maintain and use a crude pathway (several hundred wooden pallets laid end-to-end) across a state-owned and -regulated wetland. Defendant, Department of Natural Resources1 (the Department), appeals as of right the trial court’s *26order entering judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Glen Matthews, Carol Matthews, Kevin Matthews, Stephanie Matthews, Martin Schaeffer, and Ann Schaeffer2 (collectively, the landlocked property owners). The Department argues that the trial court erred by finding that privily…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Gorte v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Burt Township v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marlette Auto Wash LLC v. Van Dyke Sc Properties LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Aletha Maticka Trust v. Martin J WissmuellerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Aletha Maticka Trust v. Martin J WissmuellerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Alicia S Rowe v. Patrick and Carrie LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Ben Joseph Burkhart Trust v. Daniel CramerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API