Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Duke Armstrong appeals the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to defendants Ypsilanti Charter Township, Ruth Jamnick, Brenda Stumbo, Darcus Sizemore, Karen LovejoyRoe, and William Gagnon. Armstrong also challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to disqualify the trial judge and the later order of the chief judge affirming that denial. Jamnick, Stumbo, Sizemore, Lovejoy-Roe, and Gagnon cross appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to quash Armstrong’s first amended complaint. We affirm.
1. basic facts and procedural history
A. OVERVIEW
Ypsilanti Township is…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Ypsilanti Fire Marshal v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Merkur Steel Supply, Inc v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bachman v. Swan Harbour AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mayor of Cadillac v. BlackburnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.