Legal Opinion

Davis v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2006No. Docket 259559PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Respondent appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order reversing its denial of petitioner’s application for nonduty disability retirement benefits under MCL 38.24. Respondent had denied the application for benefits on the basis of amended statutory-language requiring the filing of an application within one year of termination from state employment, which requirement the petitioner had not satisfied. The circuit court, however, found that the amendment was prospective only and not applicable to petitioner. We conclude that the amendment of MCL 38.24 in 2002, pursuant to 2002 PA 93,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Mericka v. Department of Community HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Moeller v. American Media, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  4. Boelter v. Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. Pontiac Police & Fire Retiree Prefunded Group Health & Insurance Trust Board of Trustees v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API