Legal Opinion
Martin v. Brady
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 2002No. SC 16583PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the defendant state police officers are immune from suit by virtue of statutory, personal immunity under General Statutes § 4-1651 and, therefore, are not liable to the plaintiff for their alleged acts of misconduct. The plaintiff, Anthony R. Martin, claims that the defendants, State Troopers James Brady, Andre Joyner and Thomas Inglis and Detective Jeff Correia, violated his state constitutional rights while searching his property and seizing him for arrest. The plaintiff initially contended that he is entitled to bring…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Martin v. BradyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Rzayeva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Lopez v. SmileyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, Iowa Matt Reineke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police Department and Matt Hellickson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.