Martin v. Brady
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars the plaintiff, Anthony R. Martin, from pursuing state constitutional claims of misconduct by the defendant police officers, who searched his property and person and then seized him personally. Although sovereign immunity may be bypassed by filing, with the claims commissioner, a claim for permission to bring suit,1 the plaintiff has not pursued that alternative. The trial court held that, because of sovereign immunity and the plaintiffs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, it lacked…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Martin v. BradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Hultman v. BlumenthalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hanna v. Capitol Region Mental Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Waller v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Martin v. BradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.