Legal Opinion

Nieto v. Kapoor

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided August 4, 1999No. CIV. 96-1225 MV/JHGPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VAZQUEZ, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on First Amended Motion to Intervene for Sole Purpose of Participating in Preparation of Jury Instructions, filed June 10, 1998 [Doc. No. 191], Defendant Kapoor’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Claims made by Plaintiff Nieto, filed August 17, 1998 [Doc. No. 197], Defendant Kapoor’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Claims made by Plaintiff Gonzales, filed August 17, 1998 [Doc. No. 199], Defendant Kapoor’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Claims made by Plaintiff DeBaun, filed August 17, 1998…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ross v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Lane v. PageDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  4. Hartwell v. Southwest Cheese Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  5. Builders Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API