Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Abell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 16, 2010No. Civil Action 09-220 (JDB)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff George R. Hughes brings this action against Vincent Abell, Calvin Balti more, Modern Management Company (“Modern Management”), and Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”). With respect to Abell, Baltimore, and Modern Management, Hughes alleges violations of the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”), the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (“HOEPA”), common law fraud, usury, and a claim for an equitable mortgage. As to Wells Fargo, Hughes alleges violations of CPPA and a common law…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Findlay v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hughes v. AbellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.