Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies North America, Inc. v. Aquatech International Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, Chief Judge.
In this action, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies North American, Inc.1 (“Veolia”) seeks a declaratory judgment that two patents owned by Debasish Muk-hopadhyay (“Mukhopadhyay”) and exclusively licensed to Aquatech International Corporation * (“Aquatech International,” and together with Mukhopadhyay, “Aqua-tech”), are not infringed by Veolia’s OPUS process and are invalid. (ECF No. 60; ECF No. 267 ¶3.) The two patents identified in Veolia’s declaratory judgment complaint are United States Patent Number 5,925,255 (the “'255 Patent”), and United States…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BOSLEY v. RAWDEN JOINT VENTURES CORPORATION, D/B/A MCDONALD'SDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Christopher Kulb v. Chex Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- NAPCO, INC. v. LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY A, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Setliff v. ZOCCAM Technologies IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023