Legal Opinion

Christopher Kulb v. Chex Systems, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01390Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOPHER KULB : : CIVIL ACTION v. : No. 24-1390 : CHEX SYSTEMS, INC. : McHUGH, J. January 29, 2026 MEMORANDUM Parties rely on information exchanged in discovery in determining the merits of a dispute. Sometimes the information exchanged is inaccurate and later corrected. The question then becomes whether the original answer, whether by deposition or interrogatory, continues to be relevant as evidence. Here, that question has emerged because the Court denied a motion for summary judgment based upon Defendant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Sandra Cortez v. Trans UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API