Legal Opinion
Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 4, 2009No. 2006-1491, 2007-1180PublishedCited by 393 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
S.A.A.T. Systems Application of Advanced Technology, Ltd. and Daiwa Products, Inc. (collectively “SAAT”) appeal the denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) after a jury found that SAAT willfully infringed U.S. Patents No. 5,012,813 (“the '813 patent”), No. 6,047,205 (“the '205 patent”), and No. 6,292,685 (“the '685 patent”) and awarded lost profit damages to the patentee, Exergen Corporation (“Exergen”). Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 01-CV-11306 (D.Mass. Aug. 4, 2005). SAAT further appeals the denial of its motion for leave to amend…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by393 opinions
- Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- In Re BP Lubricants USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
388 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.