Legal Opinion
Schweizer v. DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 31, 1997No. 95-2140-JTM, 95-2141-JTM and 95-2142-JTMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs here are Kansas hog producers and the purchasers of boars from defendant DEKALB Swine Breeders, Inc. DEKALB is a Delaware corporation doing business in Kansas; its business involves all aspects of swine breeding. Plaintiffs allege the boars, purchased for breeding, had porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRV), which caused plaintiffs a loss of production in their operations through stillborn pigs and abortions. The claims, defenses, evidence, and motions in the cases are virtually identical, with a few exceptions which will be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Richard D. Ellis v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Akeva LLC v. Mizuno Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. DVM Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Graphic Technology, Inc. v. Pitney Bowes Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.