Legal Opinion
Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 1, 2001No. 94-2202-JWLPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction.
This case is before the court on defendants’ motion to strike the supplemental disclosures of two of plaintiffs retained experts, David M. Burns, M.D. and Neil E. Grunberg, Ph.D., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(1) (doc. 453). Plaintiff has responded (doc. 457), and defendants have replied (doc. 461). For the reasons explained below, although the court will not impose the drastic remedy of striking the supplemental disclosures, substantial monetary sanctions will be imposed against plaintiffs counsel.
II. Background.
Plain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad SystemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Russell v. Bronson Heating and CoolingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Unique Industries, Inc. v. 965207 Alberta Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Umbenhower v. Copart, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Box v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.